VAMPIRE BOOKS ARE STUPID
I signed up at this thing called Reader Views. They send you a few pages of a book each day for a week, so you can try books you wouldn't see otherwise.
Last week they sent me a book titled "Avengers." The first two days of it were intriguing: a cruise ship rescues two half-starved, dehydrated people found standed on an undamaged boat. There is something mysterious about the couple.
Then, on the third day, I realize the full title is "Necroscope: Avengers." The couple turn out to be vampires. The quality of the writing dives from golden to garbage. Gross violence is an understatement. What I learn is that vampires can do anything except sunbathe. They are infinitely strong, infinitely smart, infinitely skilled, infinitely disguise-able, and infinitely invincible (which makes them infinitely un-believable). Therefore, it is a foregone conclusion that when vampire vs. man, vampire wins. What else is there to say in such a book? What kind of person salivates over the endless gory details to follow? I've read a few of these books before. They are very pro-vampire. It's as though the authors aspire to be one!
Vampire novels have about as much redeeming social value as kiddie porn. And yet there are fans of this genre. I know some that fritter their nights away on role-playing games about this stuff. Full-grown adults, no less.
Hey vampire wannabes: that flashing thing in the mirror is your idiot light.
1 comment:
I was just checking out your blog, because you sent me your book to review.
I write vampire novels.
Your stereotype of vampire fans as role-playing geeks is stuck in the 80s, I'm afraid. Nobody plays Vampire: The Masquerade any more.
Most of the people who read vampire novels right now are women. That's partly because the vampire has been embraced by the romance market as the ulitmate, sexy "bad boy."
Say what you will about that, but there it is.
Post a Comment